Thursday, Dec 05, 2019
 
search SGN
SERVING SEATTLE AND THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST FOR 37 YEARS!

click to visit advertiser's website


Javascript DHTML Drop Down Menu Powered by dhtml-menu-builder.com

Last Weeks Edition
   
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website




 
 

 

 

[Valid RSS]

click to go to advertisers website
to Section One | to Arts & Entertainment
posted Friday, March 29, 2013 - Volume 41 Issue 13
Waiting for history - What the Supreme Court marriage cases will mean for equality
Section One
ALL STORIES
  next story
Waiting for history - What the Supreme Court marriage cases will mean for equality

by Abby Dees - SGN Contributing Writer

This week, as the Supreme Court considers the constitutionality of Prop 8 and DOMA, I've heard the following question a lot: 'Do you think they're going to legalize same-sex marriage or strike it down?' My answer is, 'Neither.'

There is so much nuance in these cases having to do with centuries of legal analysis, states' rights, and a fair amount of dry legal technicalities that I doubt this issue - one that seems so very simple to us - will be decided simply.

First, existing same-sex marriage rights will not - indeed, cannot - be struck down. The most the Supremes can do is uphold existing bans and say that the states and the federal government are free to decide on marriage equality for themselves. Pretty much how things are today, only with the blessings of the nation's highest court.

THE BEST-CASE SCENARIO
There's also a slim chance that the Supremes will rule that same-sex marriage is lawful across the board. This would mean not only that same-sex marriage rights would be the law of the land, but also that any discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation will now be held to the same rigorous scrutiny as gender or racial discrimination.

Court-watchers aren't betting they will go this far, and neither am I. The Supremes have never been fond of being on the cutting edge. For example, in the pivotal cases about racial discrimination (segregation in the '50s and interracial marriage in the '60s) most states were already clear that such unfounded distinctions between people were wrong. The Court's ruling affected only the minority of states that were unwilling to get with the program.

But right now, 41 states still limit marriage to heterosexual couples. I would be shocked - albeit thrilled - if they changed this in one fell swoop. Nope, nothing so tidy.

THE LIKELIEST SCENARIO
Instead, I think it's going to come down like this:

They will strike down DOMA, opening the door to federal marriage recognition. Not because of inequality, but because it smacks of overreach by the federal government into a domain - marriage law - that has always been the domain of the states. And we all know how much conservatives hate government meddling in state affairs. This last point gives me some perverse pleasure as, for once, I'm in line with my right-wing brothers and sisters on a point of law. (Wait, where are you guys going?)

States will then be free to do what they want with regard to marriages within their own borders, but they may also be compelled to recognize legal marriages of any stripe that happened in other states. Oh, watch the fur fly!

Prop 8 will be overturned too, but the ruling will probably apply only to California. California is unique among states with marriage bans in that it did have real same-sex marriage and then the voters stopped it. In our legal history, there has never been much tolerance for the yanking away of existing rights. In laypersons' terms, it's just mean.

OTHER POSSIBLE OUTCOMES
There are a few dark-horse possibilities too. The Court could punt on one or both of these cases through a technicality called 'standing.' This means essentially that the parties to the case don't have a direct stake in the outcome, and so the entire case is moot. Such a decision would be quite a cop-out. I believe the Supremes agreed to hear these cases because they're ready to address the substantive questions they raise for the first time in our history.

Second, the Court could split the baby by applying Prop 8 to a broader swath of states with laws like California's, in which all the rights of marriage are accorded except for the term 'marriage.' There are currently eight such states, but I think this outcome is also unlikely because it will create a disincentive for states down the road to offer full civil unions (or 'marriage in all but name').

So no, I don't think we will have the satisfaction of knowing that our marriages and our lives have full value under the law as a direct result of these cases. But as laws move forward, so too does public opinion, which has already changed dramatically in the last year alone. It's not time to celebrate just yet, but perhaps it's time to start looking for a fabulous party outfit.

Abby Dees is a civil rights attorney-turned-author who has been in the LGBT rights trenches for 25+ years. She can be reached through her website: queerquestionsstraighttalk.com.

Tell a friend:

Share on Facebook  Share on Facebook

Post to MySpace!Share on MySpace!

    Share on Delicious

Share on StumbleUpon!

What will the Supreme Court do now?
------------------------------
America speaks: Rallies in Seattle and nationwide support hearings at SCOTUS
------------------------------
Meet Gunner Scott - Pride Foundation's new program director has wealth of experience
------------------------------
Thinkin' Lincoln - Tony Kushner highlights insightful discussion on Honest Abe
------------------------------
Intersections - Bringing diverse communities together for change
------------------------------
Some tests are worth flunking
------------------------------
Huck won't have it - Former governor says he'll leave GOP if it endorses equality
------------------------------
Willie Nelson endorses marriage equality
------------------------------
Swing-state Democrats swing to equality
------------------------------
'We're trapped, Toto!' - Kansas wants to quarantine HIV+ people
------------------------------
Waiting for history - What the Supreme Court marriage cases will mean for equality
------------------------------
Our chap Shapp - The former PA governor was a key Gay rights ally
------------------------------
The tooth of the matter - Tulsa dentist may have exposed 7,000 patients to HIV, officials say
------------------------------
Love is on the air - Jenna and Stephanie are TV's new Lesbian power couple
------------------------------
Cocktail Chatter: Go Greyhound!
------------------------------

------------------------------
BREAKING NEWS
------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

------------------------------

click to visit advertiser's website

click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
click to visit advertiser's website
Seattle Gay Blog post your own information on
the Seattle Gay Blog
 

gay news feeds gay news readers gay rss gay
http://sgn.org/rss.xml | what is RSS? | Add to Google use Google to set up your RSS feed
SGN Calendar For Mobile Phones http://sgn.org/rssCalendarMobile.xml
SGN Calendar http://sgn.org/rssCalendar.xml

Seattle Gay News - SGN
1605 12 Ave., Ste. 31
Seattle, WA 98122

Phone 206-324-4297
Fax 206-322-7188

email: sgn2@sgn.org
website suggestions: web@sgn.org

copyright Seattle Gay News - DigitalTeamWorks 2012

USA Gay News American News American Gay News USA American Gay News United States American Lesbian News USA American Lesbian News United States USA News
Pacific Northwest News in Seattle News in Washington State News